Package Release Info

ghostscript-fonts-9.06-160000.2.2

Update Info: Base Release
Available in Package Hub : 16.0

platforms

AArch64
ppc64le
s390x
x86-64

subpackages

ghostscript-fonts
ghostscript-fonts-other
ghostscript-fonts-std
ghostscript-fonts-std-converted

Change Logs

* Mon Jun 22 2020 alarrosa@suse.com
- Force the converted Nimbus Mono font to be monospaced by using
  the --force-monospaced argument of ttf-converter 1.0.3
  (boo#1169444 #c41)
* Mon Jun 08 2020 alarrosa@suse.com
- Add a ghostscript-fonts-std-converted subpackage with fonts from
  ghostscript-fonts-std converted to TrueType format (boo#1169444)
* Fri Feb 28 2020 mardnh@gmx.de
- Add "Provides: urw-fonts" to ghostscript-fonts-std since some
  binary packages like the ones from grafana.com explicitly require
  "urw-fonts".
* Wed Dec 27 2017 dimstar@opensuse.org
- Revert last change: reconfigure_post_* does not know a -n
  parameter, which in turn results in warnings (rpm < 4.14) or
  errors (rpm >= 4.14).
  > reconfigure_fonts_post: invalid option -- 'n'
  > error: Unknown option n in reconfigure_fonts_post(c)
* Mon Dec 18 2017 jsmeix@suse.de
- Call reconfigure_fonts_* -n binary_RPM_package_name
  on openSUSE Tumbleweed and Leap 15.0 and SLE15 and later
  (boo#1067213).
* Wed Oct 04 2017 jsmeix@suse.de
- Do no longer mess around with the original fonts: Do no longer
  try to "improve" the appearance of glyphs in certain fonts in
  a SUSE-sepcific way. Provide the fonts as originally intended.
  Now neither the SUSE-sepcific ghostscript-fonts-std-8.11.patch
  nor special tools like t1ascii and t1binary from the t1utils RPM
  are needed to build a RPM package that only contains fonts.
  Cf. the entry below dated "Tue Mar 27 16:57:57 CEST 2012".
* Fri Sep 28 2012 jsmeix@suse.de
- Set the version is the same version as the current ghostscript
  package i.e. 9.06 because this ghostscript-fonts-* packages
  are the right ones for this Ghostscript version.
* Fri Sep 28 2012 jsmeix@suse.de
- Have SuSEconfig.pango stuff in RPM scriptlets only
  if suse_version < 1220 because since openSUSE 12.2
  there is no longer SuSEconfig.pango (see the "declined"
  comment of OBS submitrequest 136232).
* Thu Sep 27 2012 jsmeix@suse.de
- Using an absolute path as source in symbolic link in spec file
  to avoid an issue with /usr/sbin/Check in SLE11, SLE_11_SP1,
  and SLE_11_SP2 that would wrongly convert a relative path
  ../ghostscript/fonts into a ../ghostscript/fonts.gz file.
  Afterwards /usr/lib/rpm/brp-symlink converts it to a relative
  path so that the binary RPM gets the intended symbolic link
  /usr/share/fonts/ghostscript -> ../ghostscript/fonts
  (bnc#778879).
* Wed Sep 26 2012 jsmeix@suse.de
- Provide a link /usr/share/fonts/ghostscript which points to
  /usr/share/ghostscript/fonts (the directory where Ghostscript
  expects its fonts) to make the Ghostscript fonts also appear
  in the directory /usr/share/fonts/ where applications
  search for fonts (bnc#778879).